Shooshtime review

Shooshtime has a more editorial character than a plain video index. Its references describe photo sections, themed collections and a video feed with conspicuous titles, alongside ordinary tube material.

S Shooshtime

1. Several ways into the archive ThePornLinks records a prominent search field and sorting by Best, Most Viewed and Most Commented.
2. The destination is not always obvious Both ThePornLinks and PornVerdict report links to outside websites and prominent advertising.

Several ways into the archive

ThePornLinks records a prominent search field and sorting by Best, Most Viewed and Most Commented. It also describes recent videos, photo albums and a channels section. PornVerdict identifies named editorial collections, including Dirty 30 and Bizarre. Those collections are the clearest distinction from a catalog organised entirely through tags. See also BaddieHub review. See also SpankBang review.

The mix should not be simplified into one type of content. ThePornLinks emphasises amateur submissions but also describes studio material in channels. Pornsites similarly frames the service around both amateur video and novelty.

The destination is not always obvious

Both ThePornLinks and PornVerdict report links to outside websites and prominent advertising. PornVerdict specifically criticises the lack of clear labelling on some outgoing thumbnails. That is a navigation issue as much as a question of ad volume: readers need to know when a link leaves the archive.

Anabel’s take

The editorial collections give Shooshtime a recognisable purpose. I prefer that kind of organisation to an undifferentiated feed. The references’ repeated concern about advertising and outside links prevents me from describing the experience as consistently clear.